||A helping ministry of believers, relevant to both
the evangelistic and the pastoral role, in which people with
existential, concrete problems that hinder their trusting God in Christ
are helped to a better view of the truths of God, of redemption and of
life in the Kingdom. Bringing information and logic to bear to answer or
resolve intellectual or cognitive questions and impasses with respect to
the faith of a person or persons.
||A course of
reasoning aimed at demonstrating truth or falsehood in an attempt to
persuade others by giving reasons for accepting a particular conclusion.
An argument is judged from two perspectives: 1) Form, does the argument
have all the right parts (premises and conclusion). 2) The contents of
the premises are themselves true.
||Based on an analogy, an analogical argument is
not an argument which intends to be deductively valid.
||Readiness to act as if what you believe were
true. When your whole being is set to act as if something is so.
||The unique written Word of God. It is inerrant in
its original form and infallible in all of its forms for the purpose of
guiding you into a life-saving relationship with God in His kingdom. The
Bible contains a body of knowledge without which human beings cannot
survive. It reliably fixes the boundaries of everything God will ever
say to humankind.
||The best use of
our natural faculties of thought in submission to the Holy Spirit to
remove doubts and problems that hinder a trustful, energetic
participation in a life of personal relationship with God.
||Efforts to bring
proof that the individual teachings of the Christian faith are true.
||Readiness to act as if something is so, whether
you believe it or not.
||The deduction or decision
that an argument seeks to establish through the
premises (the reasons) that are given in an argument.
||The process of
reasoning in which a conclusion follows necessarily from the stated
premises; inferences by reasoning from the general to the specific. A
deductively valid argument is one in which if the premises are true, it
is absolutely necessary that the conclusion should be true.
||A confidence or trust in something
||A process of reasoning that derives general principles
based on particular facts or instances. In an inductive argument, the
premises provide reasons supporting the conclusion's probable
truth, but they do not offer absolute proof.
||Being able to deal with things as they are, on an
appropriate basis of thought and experience.
||The idea that all knowledge must come through the
sciences or scientific theory: knowledge must be sense perceptible. It
is a general philosophical view (now often held uncritically by the
general population) which often includes empiricism (all knowledge comes
from sense experience), scientism (the sciences are the limits of what
we now know), materialism (or physicalism - everything that exists is in
space and time), and hedonism (sensate experience, pleasure) as the only
guide to what constitutes what is good and bad for humans.
||Logic is the science
of a certain set of objective facts, facts which are of the
utmost significance for human life. These facts are objective
in the sense that they do not vary from person to person. Logic uses
reason to evaluate the relations between premises and the conclusions
that follow from them in order to discern truth. For example, if
“Whales are larger than goldfish” is true, then the sentence,
“Goldfish are smaller than whales” must be true, and the sentence
“Goldfish are bigger than whales” must be false. Logical truths,
like mathematical truths, are not made up by human beings.
||The belief that everything can be explained
through nature and natural causes.
||An attempt to
think out the best way to live and how it is best to be and to do. It is
distinctive of philosophy that it need not call upon revelation. It can,
but it need not.
||The belief that everything is physical and there
is nothing beyond what we can see and touch.
||An opening in
thought which refuses to reduce everything to science. The life of the
spirit can be known without waving your hand at math and physics. It is
the idea that knowledge can come from many sources, not just from
science and scientific theory. Post-Modernism is a mixed bag. The
problem is that when Post-Modernism is pushed in a certain way it is
impossible to have any notion of objective truth, and without objective
truth, you are just left with political correctness. It represents the
cultural withering in confidence in what was known as the scientific
worldview (see Modernism). [reference “What
Significance Has ‘Post-Modernism’ for Christian Faith”]
||Statements based on an
assumption that something is true. In logic, an argument requires at
least two premises along with the conclusion.
||A statement or
claim that something is so, whether you believe it or not.
||A process by
which the possibility of falsity in the judgment to be shown true is
eliminated. That possibility eliminated, it is impossible for the
judgment to be false. (But certainly nearly everything we count as
knowledge does not fall under that kind of strict requirement.)
||What you run into when you’re wrong.
human ability to see relationship between real or possible facts and
other real and possible facts, such that if you have the one, you have
in the degree to which they conform their thinking, talk and action
to the order of truth and understanding, or at least are committed
to doing that so far as is possible.
The reasonable person will characteristically endeavor to reason
soundly, and be openminded and inquiring
about the issues which require a response from them.
They will seek the best
concepts and classifications, testing those concepts and
classifications by relating them to each other and to the world
given by their experience and the experiences of others.
characteristically: contradicts himself, rejects known means to his
chosen goals or ends, demands the impossible, refuses to test or
consider criticisms of his beliefs, fails to seek better means of
ascertaining the truth.
can be reasonable and still be mistaken, and can be unreasonable and
happen to be correct. Still,
the reasonable person is far more likely to be correct in her
conclusions than the unreasonable person.
doesn’t depend on anything else for its existence: A mind, a will,
which has its existence entirely within itself.
||A thought or statement is true provided that what
it is about is as the thought or statement holds it to be. All truth is
absolute truth. If you believe you have gas in your gas tank, it's
either absolutely true or absolutely false.